Review Process

All submissions will undergo a peer-review process coordinated by the Scientific Committee.

The review procedure aims to ensure the scientific quality and relevance of the conference programme while providing constructive feedback to authors.

Reviewers will evaluate submissions based on:

• Originality and novelty;
• Scientific and technical quality;
• Methodological rigor;
• Relevance to conference themes;
• Clarity of presentation;
• Significance of results and conclusions.

Based on the recommendations of the reviewers, manuscripts may receive one of the following decisions:

• Accepted without revision;
• Accepted subject to minor revisions;
• Accepted subject to major revisions;
• Rejected.

Authors receiving revision requests will be expected to carefully address reviewer comments and submit a revised version of the manuscript within the specified timeframe. The Scientific Committee reserves the right to request additional revisions where necessary to ensure compliance with the conference's scientific, technical, and editorial standards.

Final acceptance of a manuscript is subject to the successful completion of the review process, submission of the final camera-ready version, and compliance with all conference requirements. The decisions of the Scientific Committee are considered final.

Papers submission and the whole review process will be done through the ASFE Open Journal System (OJS) submission platform: https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/asfe